Home›Analyze
Universal Text Analysis

Paste any text.
Get what you're not seeing.

AI agents analyze your text from perspectives you'd miss alone.

Team standup · Investor call · Strategic decision · Any text you need analyzed
0 / 50,000 characters
5–10 min · 4–16 AI agents · knowledge graph
How it works

Two products.
One input field.

You don't choose the mode. The system reads your text and routes it to the right analysts.

Meeting Analysis

Paste a meeting transcript

Shadow Agents become each participant and explain what they were actually thinking. Meta Analysts read the room from the outside.

Shadow Agents — each participant becomes an AI agent that articulates their real position, not what they said
Emotional Reader — maps tension, alignment, discomfort across the conversation
Logic Checker — finds gaps, contradictions, and unresolved assumptions
Power Mapper — who influenced whom, where the real decisions happened
Decision Tracker — what was actually committed to versus what was discussed
"Who said what they didn't say. What was really decided."
Strategic Thinking

Describe a decision you're facing

Five AI advisors analyze your situation from different angles and debate until they reach a position. You get structured reasoning, not a single opinion.

Skeptic — finds the weakest assumption in your plan
Pattern Hunter — what similar situations looked like and how they resolved
Risk Forecaster — what can go wrong and what it costs
Resource Auditor — are you trying to do this with the wrong inputs
Direction Scout — alternative paths you haven't considered
"Not one opinion. A structured argument with evidence."
You don't choose the mode. The system reads your text and picks the right analysts automatically. Paste your meeting transcript and get Shadow Agents. Describe your decision and get the advisor panel.
Real results

What you actually get

Meeting Analysis
8 Agents
0.44 Consensus Score
100s Analysis Time
"The CTO agreed to the budget not because she supported it — she was managing political exposure. Her real objection (timeline risk) was never addressed."
Consensus 0.44 means agents reached significantly different readings. Low consensus = high signal: the meeting had unresolved tension worth surfacing.
Strategic Thinking
5 Advisors
1.0 Agreement
Unanimous Verdict
"All five agents agreed: stop building, start delivering. The skeptic, the pattern hunter, and the risk forecaster converged on the same root cause."
Agreement 1.0 across five independent agents with different frames means the signal is strong. When they all agree, the direction is clear.
These are from real analyses. Names changed. Data real.
Analyzing your text
Initializing agents...