We took one real business listed for sale at $433,000 and checked every factual claim in its listing against independent sources. Eighteen claims. Here is the result, unedited.
| What the seller stated | Could we confirm it independently? |
|---|---|
| The business has been operating for 6 years | No independent source |
| Over $800,000 in lifetime revenue | No independent source |
| 14,000+ email subscribers | No independent source |
| 72% gross margin | No independent source |
| $433,000 revenue over the trailing twelve months | No independent source |
| 97% of the business is dropshipping | No independent source |
| Asking price $433,000 | No independent source |
| Claimed profit margin 18% | No independent source |
| Listed at a 2.4× multiple | No independent source |
| $432,988 revenue over the past 12 months | No independent source |
| $88,271 profit over the past 12 months | No independent source |
| 40% year-over-year growth | No independent source |
| Over $105,000 of revenue from 350 VIP customers | No independent source |
| 350 customers | No independent source |
This is not evidence of fraud. It is evidence that every number in the listing rests on one thing: the seller's word.
A screenshot of a dashboard, a PDF of a P&L, a number typed into a listing form — none of these is an independent record. They are all the same source: the person selling. If that source is the only one, then the price you are being asked to pay is built on it entirely.
Buyers say this better than we do:
“If the only proof is a screenshot, there is no proof. That’s not proof. That’s marketing.”
Being honest about the limit is the point of this page. Some things about a business genuinely leave a trace in a public register. Most financial claims do not.
| Claim type | Independently checkable? |
|---|---|
| Company exists, registration number, incorporation date | Yes — company register |
| Domain age and registration history | Yes — domain registry record |
| Legal entity identifier, sanctions screening | Yes — official databases |
| Certifications (ISO and similar) | Yes — certification register |
| Revenue, profit, margin, growth rate | No public register holds these |
| Customer count, subscriber count | No public register holds these |
So the honest position for any buyer is not “the numbers are fake” and not “the numbers are fine”. It is: these specific numbers cannot be confirmed from outside, so they must be proven from inside — by the seller, on the record, before money moves.
No. It means no independent source confirms it. A true claim and an unconfirmable claim look identical from the outside — which is exactly why the burden belongs on the seller before you pay.
Because we would be making an accusation without an independent source, and that is the same failure we are asking buyers to guard against. We only report what a source does or does not support.
Code, not opinion. Each claim was matched against public sources and public registers automatically; the status is assigned by rules, not by a person and not by a language model deciding how it feels.
Yes. Paste it and you get the same treatment: each stated claim separated out, each one marked with what an independent source does or does not say.
Check a listing you are looking at — free
Method: each claim from the listing was checked against public web sources and public registers; a claim is marked confirmed only when an independent record supports it. The subject listing is not identified. Cortex AIF.